Stop Press: ACC Forum, David Butlers deceit

David Butler: Our advice Mr Butler is that you should start telling the truth, and nothing but the truth, if you want to obtain justice for your wrongly convicted associate Mr Alan Thomas!

In november 2011 Lauda Finem received a great swath of documents from super grass, David Butler, that he had purported were genuine, true and complete. We however, based on what he had also unconsciously let slip in the “Epitaph” tapes, had formed the view that Butler was not being completely candid and was hiding his own involvement in the Takapuna conspiracy and many others.

We bided our time. The wait was worth it, one of our volunteers in Sydney managed to get a screen grab of documents that Butler  had just posted. Those documents were obviously complete, in that they had not been altered by Butler and appeared to be genuine. Whats more they had not been posted in the general lounge of www.accforum.org, rather they were posted within his own profile page. We note that following our screen grab the documents were almost immediately removed, either by Butler himself or Aaron Wislang, the sites administrator.

Below (in red is) the copy of Weals email to Megan Bly that we had received from Butler, the last paragraph (hi-lighted in blue) is that which Butler had removed, not wanting us here at Lauda Finem to see it. We will updating this post at a later time. Suffice to say, the discovery that butler had indeed concealed the extent of his involvement from us lends more credibility to our argument that Alan Thomas had indeed been framed and that Butler was involved to some extent!

Douglas James Weal

From: Douglas (Weal)

To: Megan Bly

Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 10:37 AM

Subject: Fw: Contact

Private and Confidential.

 I have been approached by several people about the following problem.

We need a “conduit” into ACC, where we can feed high value information about ACC and Claimants. However the information needs to be seen by Dr White, before it disappears down the chain of command.

This situation has been brought about because it appears that since the internal enquiry into the activities of the ACC Fraud Unit, senior ACC staff are so busy watching their backs they appear too scared to act, and to the extent they appear to be no longer receptive to copies of hard information. Several persons who have contacts within ACC have reported this problem.

What we are asking for is a contact person, phone number or email address, where the Minister can assure us, the information is seen by Dr White, before it is distributed within ACC; and if so requested, the source of the information remains with Dr White’s office.