Nearly 50 days of living on the streets without solid food, Mike Dixon-McIver says only two things will end his protest - death, or a fair deal from ACC.

Mr Dixon-McIvor, Happy Christmas from ACC’s CEO and staff

Update 24th December 2013:

So what eventually happened?

Well Mr McIvor, despite ACC and Janet Tinson’s best endeavours, has survived and prevailed – congratulations Mr McIvor, we here at LF sincerely trust that you are able to completely recover sooner rather than later – Again Merry Christmas:

December 22nd, 2013: Lauda Finem published the post below

December 23th, 2013: Theres a sudden very low key Kiwi MSM news story – ACC inexplicably decides to settle with Mr Dixon-McIvor – go figure, just might have been those doc’s in a brown envelope we here at LF had received –  But who really cares – let truth prevail!!

Original post begins:

Former ACC advocate Mike Dixon-McIver will die as a result of persecution by New Zealand’s Accident Compensation Corporation.

Nearly 50 days of living on the streets without solid food, Mike Dixon-McIver says only two things will end his protest - death, or a fair deal from ACC.

Nearly 50 days of living on the streets without solid food, Mike Dixon-McIver says only two things will end his protest – death, or a fair deal from ACC.

The 75-year-old ACC advocate has long assisted people with their claims, but has been locked in a six-year battle with the corporation after it tried to prosecute him for fraud.

The case was thrown out, and earlier this year a judge awarded Mr Dixon-McIver full legal costs of $13,000 in that matter, but the corporation refused to go to mediation to discuss damages.

That led to Dixon-McIver camping outside ACC’s head office in Aitken St, demanding more than $4 million for damages and losses. Since then nation wide protests have been held in support of Mr Dixon-McIvors campaign to hold ACC accountable. The demand for $4m is unreasonable – or is it?

ACC agreed to talks, but the protest resumed last month after Dixon-McIver declined a $90,000 compensation offer that he considered an insult.   Now $90,000.00 compensation for a malicious prosecution that lasted 4 years is unreasonable!

Three weeks ago a report from Peter McKenzie, QC, commissioned by ACC, found medical reports provided by Dixon-McIver proved a link between the corporation’s treatment of him and the mental injuries he now suffers. How relevant are a lawyers findings about a medical causal link?

However, dear old Peter found there was still no “legal liability” for ACC to pay compensation.

Bible basher and incompetent counsel Peter McKenzie doesn’t specialize in damages for malicious prosecution, or in fact malicious behavior of any kind.

Bible basher and incompetent counsel Peter McKenzie doesn’t specialize in damages for malicious prosecution, or in fact malicious behavior of any kind.

That ACC needed to pay a senior lawyer $1,000.00 an hour to inform the Corporation of what it already knows, is again criminal.  The test as to causal links is a medical one, not a legal one.   ACC would have had numerous reports completed, but by truly independent persons, and this will have put them in this position.  But the medical situation aside, how can a senior lawyer argue that ACC could defend litigation claiming malicious prosecution?.   If the Police can be successfully sued for such a tort why cannot ACC?

As always the Corporation are acting dishonestly in that it will have asked Mr McKenzie to only consider the questions it asked of him, and not to advise them on whether they are liable for acting maliciously in prosecuting Mr Dixon-McIvor.

Even if the Corporation had asked him to consider liability for malicious prosecution, amounting to persecution, LF believes that McKenzie would likely come up with an answer that suited the Corporation saying that whilst it could be arguably claimed, his appraisal of the Corporations actions indicate that the claim would be unsuccessful, or if successful, any victory would be pyrrhic given the amount of money and time consumed, deducted from the likely level of compensation.

Dixon-McIver has stated he believed he would win if he took his case to court again, but did not have the will to spend another three years tied up in legal wranglings. Dixon-McIvor is prepared for death, and it seems to LF that ACC is prepared to at least accommodate his wish in this regard.

LF has been told that one of the key persons in wanting to see Mr Dixon-McIvor lose his battle to live is none other than Janet Tinson.

LF has received information that Janet Tinson was a key protagonist in the malicious prosecution and persecution, and now wants Dixon-McIvor dead before the New Year.

LF has received information that Janet Tinson was a key protagonist in the malicious prosecution and persecution, and now wants Dixon-McIvor dead before the New Year.

Janet Tinson, in emails and other communications with top brass, has stated that;

 “If this man is given any compensation, it will open the flood gates given who else is in the wings, and has been arguing the same thing since the late nineties, and not singularly on this issue, but on other [as] serious allegations.  Whether Mr Dixon-McIvor dies or lives, we should never accept responsibility, as you know who will be inside us wanting millions of dollars for hundreds of long term claimants.  We know about the claim of XXXXXXX, and his case is stronger than this one, and then there is XXXXXX and XXXXXX.   I hope that this is over by the New Year”

It had been difficult not eating for almost a month, but Mr Dixon-McIvor was adamant he would not alter his course of action, even if that meant dying.

“They slaughtered me 6 years ago,” he said of ACC. “They could have put it right and they hid behind a point of law . . . I wrote four times to the chief executives over that time.

 “I’ve reached the end of my patience with them and, yes, it almost seems sick, but read my medical reports. The only thing they understand is no compromise.”

 ACC, in a statement spokeswoman Stephanie Melville said the latest report confirmed that Dixon-McIver had no legal basis for a claim against the corporation.

It did identify shortcomings in the ACC investigation that had caused mental and emotional distress, she said.

“Our settlement offer and formal apology reflects our acknowledgment of the investigation not being well conducted, and the impact it has had on Mr Dixon-McIver. ACC’s settlement offer is a fair one and remains open for him to accept at any time.”

BACKGROUND

August 2007: ACC advises Mike Dixon-McIver that it will prosecute him for fraud, relating to advice he provided to a client about filling in a reimbursement form.

November 2008: Judge Behrens throws out the case, expressing misgivings about the legal process. Shortly after, Mr Dixon-McIver suffers a mental breakdown.

November 2010: He is declared bankrupt.

March 2012: High Court allows his application to pursue costs against ACC.

January 2013: Judge Behrens orders the full recovery of costs and heavily criticises ACC’s decision to prosecute, calling it an “extraordinary allegation”.

May 2013: Dixon-McIver begins camping outside ACC’s office after the corporation reject his calls for compensation. He leaves one week later when ACC agrees to try mediation.

October 2013: He returns to his protest site after rejecting ACC’s apology and settlement offer. This time he also begins a hunger strike.

WHAT MRS TINSON WANTS TO HAPPEN

December 25 2013: Mr Dixon-McIvor collapses suffering from effects of prolonged hunger strike.  Taken by ambulance to hospital, but en-route suffers a heart attack, dies four times but is resuscitated. Unfortunately Mr McIvor suffers irreversible damage to his heart, and dies as a result at 11.59.59 New Years Eve.

January 1 2014: Mrs Tinson awakes to a fine day in her million dollar luxury home purchased, after a failed business venture, from her activity in ACC “black ops” where she received substantial bonuses fraudulently exiting ACC long term claimants.  Upon hearing of the death of Mr Dixon-McIvor she breathes a sign of relief and decides to take a nice drive in her late model Volkswagen GTI to the local vineyard to celebrate what has been buried along with Mr Dixon- McIvor.

But LF readership, don’t worry about truth and justice, the likes of Janet “toxic trollop” Tinson will be held accountable for her malicious, pernicious, and fraudulent behavior just like nurse Brian Athol Smith, Tinson’s previous Taranaki hit man taken out by LF a couple of years ago.

Smith

Brian Athol Smith, a registered nurse that served as Janet Tinsons attack dog, who mercilessly tormented long term claimants causing mental injury.

LF became involved and nailed Smith as the thug he was.  Smith was “quietly” sacked and moved on to work as a tutor teaching young nursing students how to administer lethal doses of care.  Smith went as far as harassing claimants nubile daughters by stalking them and taking photographs.

The photograph above was taken when Smith threatened physical violence on a severely injured claimant.  But Smith was a visible threat that was taken out.  Whereas Janet “toxic trollop” Tinson is scum of scum of scum, and then some scum.  LF intends to target Mrs Tinson for a return to unemployment and financial ruin, as justice demands.

Update 24th December 2013:

So what eventually happened?

Well Mr McIvor, despite ACC and Janet Tinson’s best endeavours, has survived and prevailed – congratulations Mr McIvor, we here at LF sincerely trust that you are able to completely recover sooner rather than later – Again Merry Christmas:

December 22nd, 2013: Lauda Finem published the post above

December 23th, 2013: Theres a sudden Kiwi MSM breaking news story – ACC inexplicably decides to settle with Mr Dixon-McIvor – go figure, just might have been those doc’s in a brown envelope we here at LF had been given? But who really cares – let truth prevail!!

Categorised in: , ,

No Comments

  • Do you censor the comments you publish?

    • If the said “comments” are not spam, or from a renegade fuckwit member of http://www.accforum.org or http://www.accfocus.org or any other bullshit web forum pretending to promote truth and justice, or otherwise disguised defamatory material, as in blatantly untrue (excluding accounts of personal experience or what LF believes to be, in good faith, genuinely held opinion), patently obvious bullshit or propaganda, no of course not, why would we; so feel free to comment Katie.

    • Given that you have asked this very serious and somewhat “loaded” question “Katie” in response – if we here at LF do not receive a response within 48hrs we will of course infer, as is our right and duty, the negative.

      LF will then, as a mater of course, publish your IP and any other identifiers that we hold so that readers may then be able to grasp of the entire scenario in context.

      • I am sure you will do as you see fit.

      • Yes, as always “Katie” our response and comment allowance are always evidence/experience based – Although we note you have yet to leave a comment or any narrative of your own personal experience – why exactly is that “Katie”?

      • Remember, “Katie” if at first we don’t publish you can always email us on laudafinem@bigbond.com and tell us your own VERY personal story of just how these ACC Corporate CUNTs hurt you – then we might just publish your whole story not just a “comment”…..why not take a risk “Katie”?

  • Samantha Hays says:

    That Janet Tinson is a real scumbag. I feel like paying her a visit with a camera team

    • you should, pictures are great for memes, which can help simplify and publicize an issue. There is nothing better than mocking scum bags via the internet…for ever.

    • You should, because the public service doesn’t need mafia syle tactics, which is what seems to be happening more and more. They are a bunch of evil bastards.

Leave a Reply to Samantha Hays Cancel reply

%d bloggers like this: